Circumcision Information and Resource Page (CIRP) provides information relating to the penis and the effects of circumcision. This page illustrates the intact penis and how the foreskin functions. The page also illustrates a circumcised penis. The gliding mechanism of an intact penis is also illustrated, along with information on the effects of circumcision on sexual intercourse.

The Embryo Development web page graphically shows the external genital changes in fetus development. A comparison is made between male and female genital development of the fetus.

Circumstitions.com page illustrating the anatomy of an intact penis. The illustration is interactive and clicking on parts of the penis will present information on that part. The page has links to an animated illustration of the foreskin retracting and extending. There is also a link to illustrations of the embrionic development of the male and female genitals.

An article in eMedicine about pearly penile papules (PPP). Pearly penile papules are small dome-shaped skin-colored papules that often are located on the sulcus or corona of the glans penis. Commonly, pearly penile papules are arranged circumferentially in one or more rows. They are considered to be a normal feature and are harmless.

This video is from the UK company that makes the SenSlip, a manufactured artificial foreskin designed to protect the mucosa so it will shed the keratinized skin. The SenSlip is a fast fix to de-keratinize the penis. Using the SenSlip is useful to quickly show men the benefits of covering the penis with a foreskin by letting them experience more sensation. Many men decide that it is worth the time and effort to restore their foreskin (growing new skin) by applying tension.

Thorough and detailed information on how to care for a boy with an intact penis, that is, a boy who is not circumcised. At first, an infant does not require any special care of his intact penis - just wipe like a finger. Care of a circumcised infant is much different because the circumcision wound must be handled carefully and kept clean as it heals. The article notes that the foreskin may not retract naturally until after the boy is 10 years old or older.

Study published in Genitourin Med. (currently Sexually Transmitted Infections), 1993 October; 69(5): 400–403. This study shows that using soap to wash under the foreskin contributes to balanitis.

For 72% of the patients with recurrent balinitis, "a diagnosis of irritant dermatitis was made. In comparison with the remaining patients, they had a greater lifetime incidence of atopic illness and more frequent daily genital washing with soap. For 28 (90%) of these patients, use of emollient creams and restriction of soap washing alone controlled symptoms satisfactorily."  

GFS (Gentle Foreskin Stretcher) is a device made by Platigo of Australia. They claim that their balloon-based device can correct true phimosis in 14 days by gently stretching the foreskin opening every day. This is the commercial site related to the site What is Phimosis?

National Organization of Circumcision Information Resource Centers (NOCIRC) page with pamphlets targeted towards parents and families of both intact and circumcised boys. The pamphlets are intended to educate and inform on foreskin care for intact boys and penis care for circumcised boys.

Article by John V. Geisheker, JD, LLM, and John W. Travis, MD, MPH, on how to properly care for an infant's foreskin. "Care of the intact penis is a simple task - leave it alone - so why all the confusion?"

"Proper infant hygiene, for both girls and boys, is actually astonishingly simple: 'Only Clean What Is Seen.'"

A site dedicated to treating phimosis, sponsored by Platigo Corporation, the makers of a balloon-based device (GFS - Gentle Foreskin Stretcher) that stretches the foreskin to correct phimosis. The site advocates using their appliances to correct phimosis.

Circumstitions.com page with illustrations of an intact penis shown in various stages of being retracted.

The Functions of Foreskin (Prepuce) is an educational medical slideshow covering the development and functions of the prepuce (foreskin) from before birth through adulthood. There are no moving images in this documentary, only still pictures and diagrams from medical journals. The terminology used while professional is not incomprehensible to a lay audience.

Study published in the Journal of Urology, Volume 167, Issue 5, Pages 2113-2116 (May 2002).  The study's purpose was to determine the effect of the prepuce (foreskin) on sexual intercourse. The researchers examined sexual function outcomes in men who experienced sexual intercourse in the uncircumcised and circumcised states.

The study chose as subjects men who were circumcised for medical reasons. Only 7% of the men were circumcised as elective surgery. Even with such a large proportion of the subjects being circumcised for having problems with their foreskin, 38% reported that it was worse being circumcised.

Study published in BJUI (British Journal of Urology International), Volume 99, Issue 4, Pages 864-869 (March 2007). This is the Sorrells study. See a YouTube video of Dr. Sorrells discussing the study and his results.

A study published in Urologia Internationalis, Vol. 75, No. 1, 2005 (Urol Int 2005;75:62-66) (DOI: 10.1159/000085930). The authors assessed the effect of circumcision on sexually active men and the relative impact this may have on informed consent prior to surgery. 

The male subjects were circumcised for a benign desease. Penile sensation got worse for 18% of the men who got an adult circumcision. Only 61% of the men were satisfied with their adult circumcision. Considering that circumcision was for a disease, it is significant that not more men were satisfied with the cure.

A documentary type video with information on several men's experiences with their intact foreskin regarding sensitivty. A circumcised man asks questions and provides his impressions.  The video provides a wide perspective of the variations of sensitivity and foreskin length. The video is embedded here or go to YouTube to see it.

Dr. Morris L. Sorrells M.D. discusses the penile sensitivity tests he and other doctors conducted that studied circumcised and intact penises. They concluded that circumcision ablates the most sensitive parts of the penis. Read about his study: Fine-touch pressure thresholds in the adult penis. See the video below:

Study published in the Journal of Urology, Volume 167, Issue 5, Pages 2113-2116 (May 2002).  The study's purpose was to determine the effect of the prepuce (foreskin) on sexual intercourse. The researchers examined sexual function outcomes in men who experienced sexual intercourse in the uncircumcised and circumcised states.

The study chose as subjects men who were circumcised for medical reasons. Only 7% of the men were circumcised as elective surgery. Even with such a large proportion of the subjects being circumcised for having problems with their foreskin, 38% reported that it was worse being circumcised.

Sex As Nature Intended It: The Most Important Thing You Need to Know About Making Love, is a book authored by Kristen O'Hara.

Chapter 8a, The Normal Thrusting Rhythm of the Natural Penis vs. The Abnormal Thrusting Rhythm of the Circumcised Penis: How It Affects a Woman's Sexual Pleasure during Intercourse is reproduced on the website.

I believe that once women come to realize how important the natural penis is to their sexual pleasure and love-relationship happiness, that the key to a woman's sexual ecstasy is the foreskin of the penis, that foreskin restoration by the man  will allow them to experience new joys from intercourse that they never thought possible, they will want their men to have foreskins.

Article published in Journal of the New Zealand Medical Association, September 12, 2003, Vol 116, No. 1181. Women reported that they are significantly more likely to experience vaginal dryness during sexual intercourse with circumcised men than with genitally intact men. The authors thought that the vaginal dryness becomes more apparent as women get older.

The authors concluded "Most likely, reported vaginal dryness and the related clinical designation female arousal disorder is but a normal female response to coitus with a man with an iatrogenically deficient penis." An iatrogenically deficient penis is one that has been circumcised.

The Daily Loaf writes How to pleasure an uncircumcised man. Somewhat tongue in cheek and light on details, the article is nevertheless indicates that people are starting to learn about the foreskin.

A study published in Urologia Internationalis, Vol. 75, No. 1, 2005 (Urol Int 2005;75:62-66) (DOI: 10.1159/000085930). The authors assessed the effect of circumcision on sexually active men and the relative impact this may have on informed consent prior to surgery. 

The male subjects were circumcised for a benign desease. Penile sensation got worse for 18% of the men who got an adult circumcision. Only 61% of the men were satisfied with their adult circumcision. Considering that circumcision was for a disease, it is significant that not more men were satisfied with the cure.

Sex As Nature Intended It: Top 10 Ways Circumcised Sex Harms Women is a graphical guide that explains the mechanics of the sex act and illustrates the difference between intact sex and circumcised sex. This is a sexually graphic site.

This site is an extension of the Sex As Nature Intended It site.

A page on the Sex as Nature Intended It website describing the sexual function of the foreskin. This page provides simple tests that people can take to see how the foreskin functions. For example, the page describes how to feel the difference between fine touch nerves and pressure sensitive nerves by touching the lips and cheeks. The intact penis has both fine touch nerves and pressure sensitive nerves. Unfortunately, circumcision removes much of the fine touch nerves and if the shaft skin is tight, prevents the proper stimulation of the pressure sensitive nerves.

Study published in the BJUI (British Journal of Urology International), Volume 99, Issue 3, Pages 619-622 (March 2007). The study showed that there was a loss of sexual pleasure and enjoyment for a significant percentage of men.

Paper published in BJUI (British Journal of Urology International), Volume 83, Suppl. 1, pages 79–84, (1999), and authored by K. O'Hara & J. O'Hara. The authors surveyed women having sexual experience with both circumcised and anatomically complete partners to determine if there were any differences in sexual enjoyment. They determined that circumcision results in a less satisfying sexual experience.