Sorry but Sandra your comments don't stack up. You don't like the feel of a man getting the pleasure of his foreskin moving inside you? Even though it rubs against your g-spot gently and deliciously and makes him feel fab? What kind of misandrist says this kind of thing? You're cutting off your nose to spite your face! Also the comment that a man's erections are stronger if cut - nonsense. He has taut dry skin - that's not the same as having a stronger erection. In fact with extra skin to expand into a man who's uncut is bigger - by 0.8cm one Australian study found. Many intact men have a distinct area of ridged skin which sticks out behind the glans (where the extra foreskin concertinas) which rubs against a woman's G-spot quite precisely. Do you HONESTLY think that was a mistake Mother Nature made - to create ridges behind the glans in the EXACT area where they would interact with her G-spot ridges?? Have you ever looked at a condom designed 'for her pleasure' - they're clearly modelled on an intact man! Re Erectile dysfunction this is one of the side effects of circumcision - rare but it does occur. And the idea that woman like a man to go on and on and on pumping away is also nonsense. Orgasm is easier with an intact man - especially simultaneous orgasm - why on earth would you need him to pump on and on grinding his teeth (as I've seen circumcised men do) when you could have a great orgasm together? It's just nonsense.... Check out the study by Solinis et al on couples who experienced him being circumcised during their sexual relationship. This showed the women were even more p***ed off than the subjects themselves!! Although 2/3 said the man lasted longer only 1/6 thought this was a benefit. I think this proves my point, if such common sense that a soft sensitive ribbed penis is better for a woman needed to be proven!